lmao@streetrunner

I guess I'm missing the joke on this? I see you posting this alot.... =)

i'm laughing my ass off about streetrunner, 'cause he's a douche. no joke intended.
i also try to copy sonic. :(

jonesy is fat

to me she always manages to look exactly the same no matter when or how I see her- like they pull her out of a box and she just looks that way.

I think Jonesy is onto something about her being a fem-bot or something from Japan....

I notice you have a very high popularity rating, so I examied this picture closely. found no relation to cooller. therefore I wont plus you.

getting plussed without m,entioning cooller is hard work ;)

wat? cooller? have a [+].

so this it how it works... :D

You have a negro running the country and you''re still talking about racism for some stupid music award.

he's only half negro

so, when you don't have racism in one area, racism in a other areas becomes alright?

"ok"

There will always be racism, its perfectly natural.

The only true form of racism is the world carries on like white people are the ONLY racist people on the planet.

It really doesn't. Everyone knows there is racism from all sides.

Only white racists as yourself always try to point that out to make themselves look some sort of victims. The fact is that in the areas where we live, racism primarily does come from the whites-
I for myself have never felt any racism twowards from anyone, regardless of their own race, but I have witnessed of racism from white to others.

And even if racism is "natural" to some extent, so does not make it justified in any way.

Humans hurting and killing other humans is also "natural"...

"Racism" will always come from the most dominat race stupid.

It doesn't mean to say that if the shoe was on the other foot it would be any different. It would not.

White people run the show for the time being becaue the went out there and did what was required to get into that position.

You can't expect 100's of years of work to be undone in a few decades.

"Racism" will always come from the most dominat race stupid

What a smart remark. As if I said anything different...


The moronic remark comes right after, where you claim the Europe's and North America's success is related to race. The people here had success in the last hundreds of years and we happen to be white, that is all there is to it.

History tells us that they have been vast and powerful empires all over the world by all races.

Of course, people like you love to ignore history when it contradicts them.

HISTORY.

I'm talking about present day.

The most powerful countries are white and they generally lead the modern world. That's not to say others are not powerful or catching up, but in the deepesent sense its still a white mans world.

Also look at black countries like Africa, what a disaster, corrupt, shit hole.

China, many parts of asia, huge poverty and disasterous human right laws.

Middle east/India. Extremist hell hole.

No other race provides anywhere near the level of leadership that the modern world is moving in.

Learn to read.
I never said anything different.


Also since you are such a spelling fanatic you might wanna check "deepesent", it looks a bit wrong to an illiterate person like me.

/edit

I didn't say anything different, except for the lines you edited in while I was replying. But good of you to validate my point that you chose to ignore history, simply because it contradicts you.

Also look at black countries like Africa

Egypt?
Catharge?


Also, Africa is not a country ;)

Africa, what a disaster, corrupt, shit hole.

Corrupt are many countries, including those with white people.

like Romania =/

exactly.

Or Austria. Or Germany.

Or any other country.

believe me, the level of corruption in Romania is unbelievable, at least talking abt the number of persons who are "involved" -maybe because it is not a rich country, on the other hand, in other countries there might be less persons who are corrupted, but those who are, are... well we have different stacks of money involved
different levels of corruption

also, sometimes, if the law is wrong, corruption keeps things balanced, so I would not call corruption something bad, in any situation -imagine the nazi regime for example, if the germans would have done alltimes what Hitler said, no jews would have escape the concentration camps

I was in Romania for two months, enough to get an impression and I know you are right.

However, the corruption in countries like Austria and Germany is still threre and I woudn't be surprised that the total amount of money involved is higher than in Romania. They are however much better at hiding it.

for example, just last week I learned how a how a big Austrian town handles big public projects in a certain sector. The obey the law and offer it to all European countries, but they include many terms that strongly favors a specific company. Including a term that forces every competitor to higher technicians of that company for insane prices.
So, they can always make the best offer and always get the contract even though it was all legal.
Unsurprisingly, a high ranking member of the town's parliament is a board member of that company.

And I also know of many "small" cases of corruption in the business world.


So, I suppose one of the differences is that is not as obvious as e.g in Africa or Romania and also that you don't get nearly as much for you money. No "get out of jail for 1000€".

L2R jamerios edits

damn, missed it.


Oh well.

=)

the man needs time toc colle ct his toughts. what

like a smart person used to say in some debate: "check out for my spellings, please, maybe you'll find some error, just to prove it that you are right"
[don't get me wrong, I know you usually have something to say, but please stop with this spelling shit, it just rises questions abt your whole statements]

-or are you just using this because you know it makes Jamerio nervous? =))

I just did it, cause he criticized my spelling earlier.

And I'm still not sure whether he meant deepest or dependent or something else here. Not that it matters :P

That was an obvious typo while I banged out a quick reply, your errors are just down to not knowing as your mistakes are subtle.

There is a big difference, secondly, you're usually trying to be a smug asshole when you make yours.

You're always going to come off second best.

Just like the mistake of not replying to a post ? :P

That was an obvious typo while I banged out a quick reply, your errors are just down to not knowing as your mistakes are subtle.

There is a big difference,

That I consistently don't know how embarrassing is written is an assumption of yours that you will have to prove. One singular mistake can be anything. You even tried to make the same point with "two" and "to", which just goes to show your level of desperation, as I shouldn't be able to write a coherent sentence, if I didn't know the difference.

On the other hand, you consistently fuck up "it's" and "its". It a subtle mistake, I know ;)

secondly, you're usually trying to be a smug asshole when you make yours.

I know that I can come across as that, and I intentionally do it when talking to you. On the other hand ,you just provided us with a link to another forum where people also think you are an idiot.

You're always going to come off second best.

I can live with being second best, knowing that you will always be listed under "also ran". Especially, when I participate in an "English language competition". ;)

"Just like the mistake of not replying to a post ? :P"
the limits of an idiot is easy to find for most people, the limits of a smart person usually remains undetected, which usually leads to disastruous* results in the long run, so imo your mutual "idiot" sentence remove each other

"you just provided us with a link to another forum where people also think you are an idiot."* everytime I see a sentence who was made by masses, I reconsider

you forgot abt Jonesy's theme :P

note the ":P" after my statement.


But what about a opinion which was formed simultaneously by two masses that don't influence each other?

well masses kinda think the same, anyway. it is enough that someone is pointing his finger to you, and then everybody will start screaming: burn him! he's a witch! :P

what I'm saying is that I don't consider Jamerio THAT stupid, but what do I know, I might be wrong, sheeps are kinda expensive these days =))

sure that happens, but apparantly they had already burned banned him, before any one of us pointed.
And we also thought he was an idiot before seeing those threads.

There are of course different types of idiots.