virgin also but it works.....

wait I lie

it doesn't, wtf thought it did

I'm interested to know why they've even bothered doing this.

What next, my beloved xvideos.com

Seriously though, I hope people kick up a fuss about this ridiculous shit else it'll just get worse.

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/UK_ISPs_erect_%27..._Wikipedia

Other albums featuring nudity below the age of 16 have previously caused controversy; Blind Faith attracted criticism as did Houses of the Holy, and Nirvana's Nevermind.

ha, I was going to mention Blind Faith, one of my favorite album covers as well :(

404 on be

blank page on virgin....

blocked on vodafone mobile broadband :E

sorry, but no. has it been mandated by the UK government that these sites not be displayed? if not, then it isn't censorship.

in any event, I've been looking to check out that album for a while, because that cover is hot.

wat?

I'm sorry. do you not understand what censorship is?

??? allahu akbar

lmao@uk

Don't your videogames have green blood in them?

if the video game has a lot of aliens then the answer is yes.

stll,
lmao@uk

Was looking at this earlier, I'm against blocking and all that shit but seriously, I'll get over that one page that I can access in about 5 other ways anyway.

guess not being able to access that page in particular is not exactly a big loss to the whole of mankind, still it's kinda... strange to see that level of censorship without any note about it. or is it known in public that this is done? like have people always been aware of that censorship?

cut the crap or I'll report that you're playing (*the game we do not talk about*) to the german authorities.

I emigrated to Sweden :d go ahead! xD

if you want I can give you a cop's phone number with whom I played that game...

naked little girls!

lmao now i can look at all the dirty album covers i want!

son of a

http://www.iwf.org.uk/media/news.249.htm

"the image was assessed according to the UK Sentencing Guidelines Council (page 109). The content was considered to be a potentially illegal indecent image of a child under the age of 18"

Shouldn't they do a bit of research and find out if she was under 18?! or is the use of "guessing" used in running they're organisation.

and where would be the fun in that?

Not blocked on Bulldog.

another bunch of instituted cunts trying to justify their existence with meaningless censorship

yes, children have genitals, you secretely guilty pricks.. live with it!

now go hunt for childporn rings, not some nude photos that don't have any sexual relevance for 99.9% of normal human beings

Yeah but if you turn the album cover upside down, then fold it to look like a giant origami cunt you get the secret childporn message

Exactly, if you think that album cover is anything close to pornography you are probably a closet paedophile.

Blocked on O2/BE

Not that bothered about that 1 page myself..

im on be* and cannot access it.

NOT blocked on my DEMON. i wonder why that is

2nd link works for me!

lal

works now

Yea same here. Some stupid cunt is getting paid to me these pointless decisions.

IWF pulled the page off the censor reel.

http://www.t3.com/news/iwf-reverses-wikipedia-ban?=37513

Ban reversed!