Where do you think you are?

Present day 12/11/2017 @ 15:27pm (UK Time)

I can’t justify throwing away 60 bones on a rehashed game. Maybe when it goes on sale.

Yeah I guess you can hang fire, I've always been a COD fan, until it all went jet-packy aids.

Glad they've gone back to the good stuff!

MW:1 was the bomb though.

I was planning to give it a shot as I liked the very first CoD and the ww2 atmosphere is still appealing in shooter games.

Turned out the 'ww2' title is a lie and the game takes place in an alternative reality, where nazis dont use swastikas and black females fight for wehrmacht.

So no.

Well if you're waiting for it to be historically accurate, I can totally say it's not accurate at all. However it is fun as fuck :D

Another horrible game and another terrible thread

Another horrible response by another terrible user.

CoD WW2 is certainly a better game than QC

Agreed. I dont really pay much attention to the games industry but I have been watching QC's 'development'. I was watching a video about early Overwatch development (produced by Blizzard) and it was just amazing how much more organised that game is, even if it is just a casual shitfest.

Intended to, then saw red dot sights and shit on the mp44's.

nah. garbage.

They actually had little glass dotted sights back in ww2 so yeah, it's not inaccurate.

I came from cod1 and 2 originally, i wanted those awkward ironsights on the 44 and Bren. Fuck glass dotted sights lad. Another dumbed down waste of money.

Also lack of bolt action rifles? Wheres the kar98k / lee enfield / mosin? Lame.

There is a kar98k and lee enfield...

I'm still 50/50 with the Enfield. Can't use the 4x on it, just doesn't feel right cause you need to hit the guy in the upper torso for a one shot.

They're all there and you don't HAVE to put those new sights on

I rock the kar98 and it's fucking beautiful.

I also come from cod 1 / 2 and 4(pro mod) and the game runs nice and smooth.

yep, credit where credit's due, 250 fps consistent

They didn't use those sights in battle. It's like saying ww II had jet planes and nazis had drones. They did, but they weren't used.

Right, Guess you don't know much about WW 2 in general then.

Lmao sthpn thinks call of duty is historically accurate

How can you be so ignorant and dumb

Where did I write that Call of Duty is historically accurate?

Do you have an ability to read correctly?

"Guess you don't know much about WW 2 in general then."

So before you even attempt to call me ignorant or dumb, you might want to level up your reading comprehension.

You think WW2 soldiers ran around with red dot sights. Only someone comically ignorant of the economics and logistics of WW2 would think that. Someone that got his knowledge from videogames and maybe a sprinkle of wikipedia to confirm the rumors.

Guess you still can't read correctly.

Not once did I say that anything from COD was historically accurate.

I'm a massive world war fan in general as both sides of my family have both served in WW1 and 2 - So you can take your condescending bullshit elsewhere, I don't know, I guess it's just plain ignorance you base all of your responses on.

Hey, whatever floats boat m8.

It's very funny how you carefully avoid the topic of the issue now that you've been exposed. You should have avoided pulling out the "my family" card, because now you look doubly ignorant. You don't know shit but pretend you do because someone else did.
You're an embarrasment to your ancestors.

Go to your relatives and ask them what add ons they had on their rifles.
If they had red dots or acogs.

What was their "setup".

Spoiler: they had none, and will look at you like you played too much videogames.

Rofl, you're an idiot.

P.S : Exposure lol?

You need to go learn to comprehend what I've read, You're the ignorant one here not me. It's cute how just naturally assume everything is a derived from a video game mentality.

There were semi-reflective mirrors on a lot of weapons from the early 1900's I'm not even going to waste anymore time with you as you've got your head so far up your own ass you aren't able to comprehend non-modern weaponry.

Yes, your ignorance has been exposed. your wall of text acting as a smoke curtain doesn't work, because at the end of the day, the argument was if call of duty's use of sights was realistic. You even swore on your whole family, and after a desperate wikipedia research ,that's the best you could come up with:

"There were semi-reflective mirrors on a lot of weapons from the early 1900's"

Which shows how grasping at straws your are.

The average infrantyman had no sights on its rifle in world war two outside of the standard iron sights.

This was true even up to the vietnam war!

But of course an ignorant call of duty kid will pretend soldiers that didn't even have enough resources to adequately eat, or cover themselves in the winters, and that struggled to even have enough bullets to shoot with their press-stamped rifles were running around with expensive experimental optics!

And defendind your original statement after having being caled out on its evident falsity is even more stupid. you're digging yourself a deeper grave every time you post.

Go prove me wrong with weaponry from those days, funny though because you can't;

Also, if you actually were able to read what I've written, I did not once mention anything historically accurate about world war 2 and the actual video game cod ww 2.

Like I've mentioned in several responses to you, you tend to process things in a totally incomprehensible manner, as if nothing is true outside of your own beliefs.

Were you apart of ww1/2 and the vietnam war? - Do you know what actually went on behind the lines of duty?
Probably not, but because whatever shit you've read in text books gels with your beliefs, anything outside of your own knowledge is something you and many others can't seem to fathom.

Ignorance is bliss as they say, I guess you're one of the many who just take things at face value.

Also, it shows that you have zero clue about weaponry throughout any period.

There were certain divisions of infantry, deployed across Africa and France which frontlined as close quarter infantry, for taking out groups of soldiers, stuck in bunkers etc. Massive shipments of shotguns were used from America, Remmington, if you're familiar with the make. They were issued a sight called Nydar reflex, which yes, was pretty shitty in poor light conditions, nevertheless they were used, even in Vietnam as well.

If you're dismissing iron sights as well, then again, you're just purely ignorant.

I'm still waiting for you to find something in this thread where I said EVERYTHING in COD WW2 is 100% historically accurate to the actual World War 2.

You're just nit picking.

nex1, you seem to enjoy arguing. even when you know you are wrong.
you accused him firstly for thinking everything else accurate when he had not even said anything. Then he dropped one hundred percent accurate information on you and it is like you were raised being told by everyone around you that you are always right.

Why don't you come to texas? We have a gun shows where you're allowed to look at and fire all different types of weapons pre and post world war 1 and 2. Yes there were sights attached to some of the infantry weapons. Not as prevalent but they were there. Not just iron sights as you mentioned. Stop being a dick. You are allowed to be wrong. Set your ego aside bro.

I've just started to ignore the cunt Anon, the kid has no reasoning ability whatsoever, pretty much just shit talks everyone.

Waste of human material and waste of oxygen.

The Me-262 did see combat.

Like i said.

i jam zombies with fizzle jr my mane =]<o~~
i dont really jam tho more like i buss it
*busses tha blunt*