So do you guys think Jack the Ripper was carrying out some kind of Masonic agenda? If you read the descriptions (organs placed over the shoulders), it does beg the argument. Mason-defenders argue that because the term 'Juwes' was never used in Masonic-text, it invalidates the murders as being Masonic in origin, but, I don't see why someone couldn't form a new word to, in code, describe something from Masonic text. Some aspects of Masonic ritual could have been excluded or removed from the crime-scene, before any detectives could enter them into official-record.

People say Jack the Ripper was such a horrible person, but he was humane enough to only slice the throat. All the mutilations occurred after death.

Isn't it odd though, when serial-killers have some kind of civic or cultural attachment? Like the Axeman of New Orleans, he said he would murder someone, but would exclude anyone in Jazz clubs.