Well technology always changes things gets cheaper always.
Now 2600k beats I7 950 literately. You cant always wait for something then you will never have anything.

Only thing I always wonder 'never buy motherboard which is over price than cpu' And always get ram which supports highest speed your motherboard capable of.

For me your build is quiet nice which can give you solid 4 more years. You can play games you want it will never be outdated. Even I play Crysis 2 without lagging on my 3year old Q6600 and GTX 275 on medium settings. But I am still waiting for 2600k to price drop down. Which is enough for my requirements and will give me 4 more years.

You can always update your gfx card in future if you need. Your motherboard supports it. And new games doesn't load on CPU it gives load on GPU so you will be fine for few years. I updated mine once in 2 years from 9600gt to GTX 275 a year ago.

Games doesn't have to be max out to play anyway. Game settings adjustable according to your pc. Just get better frame rates so you can play without lagging.

You cant always wait for something then you will never have anything.

Word.

You cant always wait for something then you will never have anything.

Word.

double word

double word

have you tried Q43A [on a dedicated server]

He's back!

saved every spare penny for the past 7 months, or maybe a year and a few months

No.

last post with the name was dec 2009

You remember me?

Welcome back, very nice rig, but will it run Q43A?

What is "Q43A?"

god

have you tried militia?

but have you tried 2 years and a shit load of recoding and new features out of beta MP with pure servers and onconnect download, both SP and MP in 1 dll for windows and linux for client or server all in 1 pack just upload the mod to your gane server and restart with the Q43A fs_game and windows and linux clients will download it from your dedicated q4 game server, without any vehicles in MP maps with all new features enabled no extra bandwidth is used unless you have 16-128 players on a map and no different to running on a lan server -clientprediction, and a name change later Q43A #19

very bad choices you made!

good luck.

What do you think of my build?

I think it's absolutely awesome, and it makes you worthy as a person.

Big Bang Xpower

... sounds dirty. :p

I would've gone with an ASUS sound card and tried to squeeze in an SSD somewhere. Other than that, nice rig.

Well I'll be damned. How are you Monkey_Business?

man u must be very rich spend $2,500 for gaming rig .

i just hope your lcd is 120 hz :D its double fun than 60 hz ! MUST HAVE !

lol $2,500.

who paid for it?

2,500 on a pc w/o a ssd???

I would have got an SSD if I were going to fork out that much for a pc :)

Also, the new "Sandy Bridge" Core i7 architecture refresh (http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=2063130#pid2063130) are an exceptional series of processors, you were unlucky with the timing of your build not to get one of these too :(

So I would personally sell your cpu, buy either the 2500K or the 2600K (sizeable performance boost, and incredibly overclockable for the future), and get a SSD, as you clearly have deep pockets :)

2500k 2600k are fast but with only with multiplayer overclocking. There is not much into it to overclock tbh. X58 is still better than P67 that is why I am waiting few more months and get more money sort out for Ivy Bridge.

Wait what?! These processors are as fast as the most recent extreme edition (with 6 cores) in everything but the most threaded of applications; for £180 you get a 2500K in comparison to £700 previous refresh performance.

They can overclock to 4.9Ghz (as you said, with their unlocked multiplier) on AIR....its the best bargain around for years, since the 144 opteron or Q6600. They're nothing short of incredible value for money...

I did not say they are not good. I said their overclocking / tweaking is not as good as 1366 Its not for replacement for 1366 they are replacement for 1156 so not quiet enthusiastic level of processors.

They do have solid performance. 2500k is far better than AMD 1100t 6core and there is no major difference in 2500k vs 2600k.

When X68 will come up you will see real replacement for 1366. I never liked P67 chipset so tho I had money I never bought it later they found problem in Sata controller but eventually they have corrected it. And only one 16x gfx slot it you run 2 cards they run at 8x and 8x unless they are nf200 chip. I had duel core before now I have quad core and I will buy hex core cpu in future but that just me and I am not yet settleing down another 4 years on 2600k..

Those reasons are fair enough :)

I never intend to use more than one gfx card, so the lower number of PCI-E lanes available wasn't a problem for me; the only type of multiple GPU system thats worked decently for me in the past is a duel chip on a pcb rather than two discrete cards (it really, really depends on the drivers and the partially the game devs, which you'll know anyway). Was very disappointed with personal experience of sli and crossfire, although my 4800X2 has been great thus far :)

As for the SATA controller debacle, it was pretty clear that was going to get sorted out with bios revisions etc; and most decent motherboard vendors usually add in some more sata slots with third party chips; I don't plan on having silly numbers of HDD's in my pc, thats what a NAS is for imo...

I would not be surprised if the X68 was as "buggy" on release too, Intel are pretty notorious for that. I also don't really see that much benefit in going to six cores; applications are getting better threading wise, but programs which scale well with more than two to four processing cores are few and far between...let alone 6. I reckon 2 to 4 cores at a higher clock rate will be faster overall than 6 cores at a lower clock rate for quite a few years to come.

Also, my next upgrade will probably be a 2500K this summer, would be happy to have that for another four years or so; have had my Q6600 + 4800X2 for quite a few years now, and don't really need to upgrade either frankly; the ramp in performance in games from year to year has slowed quite a bit due to the console, and is most likely to continue too until the next gen consoles arrive :( It does mean that we can use the same hardware for a little longer though :)

So yeah, in short I don't have a problem with its chipset, and it would easily last me for another few years :)

Edit: With regards to the die shrink/Ivy Bridge, Intel have been having quite a few problems with this new process (certainly nowhere near the problems with the 45nm jump, but still),and I would be very surprised if they can run them much higher than 5.0ghz which you can get out of Sandy Bridge anyways... As for the on-die graphics, couldn't care less. Would also push down the prices of the current 2500K and 2600K. I don't think your going to see anything special/worth buying over these two processors until the "tock" of the new Haswell architecture.

"I said their overclocking / tweaking is not as good as 1366"

On the contrary it's so much better now. Hitting 5Ghz speeds on air without any hickups. The only downside is that if u go to much above 1.4-1.5 vcore issues might appear in some cases.

Sandy Bridge atm is the best bang for buck you can get.

if you can afford it, buy those 3 gb gtx580´s, at least they won´t run out of vram at high resolutions. however graphics cards are the first component that becomes a bottleneck. now you´re spending twice as much on graphics alone. your 5870s are already choking on games like metro or crysis, expecially with high res textures and AA that can take easily more than 1 gb of video memory.

sure, 2500k would be even better as it overclocks higher (often to ~5 ghz with good cooling), but your 930 has more than enough power for today, better keep that money for ivy bridge. get an ocz vertex 3 if you want an ssd now.

ill give you my imput

This build is so last year.

The Sandy Bridge processor is not significantly faster than the Nehalem. Only by about 15-20% and the gaming performance boost in hardly noticeable.

Plus, the SB only has dual channel memory.

I am waiting for the 8-core SB processors late this year. Also, in 2012, the "Ivy Bridge" will be a 22nm shrink of the SB.

I'm waiting for a system in 2014 that will outclass your system...

wait wait wait now I'm waiting for a system in 2016 that will outclass the aforementioned system...

wait wait now I'm.................................

I have a fairly big penis too.

honestly, spend 1200 now, spend 1200 next year, you'll have 2 pc's , one to sell, the last one just as update as the one you have now.

My e-peen rig for alot less than OP:

*2600k [email protected]
*ASUS Maximus IV Extreme
*8GB Corsair DDR3 OC@1866MHz RAM
*GTX 285 (Will upgrade when Rage system specs are known)
*AW2310 Monitor 1080p @ 120hz
*4x2TB 7200RPM HDD
*1x 80GB SSD
*Corsair H70
*Corsair 1200W PSU
*Creative SB X-Fi Titanium
*Lian Li pc x2000 case
*BD Drive
*MS Intellimouse 3.0 :-)

;-p

You really need 8TB of space, or you using raid 5?

Even 4TB is ridiculous...

He download and store porn in it. So he needs that much space. :P

Should have gotten an array of SSD's.

you can just get a OC box from http://www.overclockers.co.uk/productlist.php...;catid=339 darren brown and other top 10 3dmarkers will do their thing for cheap

When I took my Core i7 930 to 3.4 GHz, it was idling in windows desktop at 50 *C. I am using the ZALMAN CNPS9900 cooler. Something is very wrong.

find 1 of these

http://www.thecoolingshop.com/product_info/Co...34122.html

coolermaster have a standalone water block, that need no pumps etc, just like a normal heatsink but water is the copper, which should be thermalgel

corsair have a standalone block too

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=WC-002-CS

100c tops with water

cheap n nasty thermal gel does 200c, the good stuff does 600+ c

that thing you just posted is very bad, I'm around several review sites and on of the best of them once reviewed this h50 and the h70 h2o system coolers with really resurgent results.

if you don't believe me, here's the review: http://pclab.pl/art43754.html

however it is in Polish, but you could at least have a look at the comparison graphs inside this article.

i never said it was good, thermalgel heatsink blocks are the future. though

standalone water blocks are only rubbish if you overclock, the heat doesnt have enough space to "dissipate" and are made sq/volume for that specs of the cpu

that one's terrible.

I would recommend 1) Prolimatech Megahalems 2) Zalman CNPS10X Quiet 3) Noctua NH-U12P 4) Scythe Mugen 2

those are pretty much the best air coolers around.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php...ubcat=1395

Use Noctua NH-D14 best air cooler on market beats H70. If your cpu is overheating then you need to back off your overclock or reduce voltage down.. more voltage to mean more heat.

as if beating the h70 is any hard.

H70 does me fine, I really can't be bothered to set up a bespoke watercooling kit, but I need something better than most air cooling heatsinks, and the H70 keeps my 2600k at about 45C at 4.6GHz after hours and hours of gaming. That's good enough for me.

Go and check reviews everywhere. NH D14 beats H70 hands down.

I've just stated that the H70 is not good at all, didn't say a thing about the DH14 being bad.

really? what about Prolimatch Megashadow with dual delta 120mm Delta fans

Mega Shadow is more expensive than the Megahalems while not performing any better, in fact the Mega Shadow is thought to be just an aesthetically better version of the Megahalems - the performance stays the same as the Megahalems though.

ye i know, i could have bought the megahalems but that nickel plated looking damn!

also i made a custom bracket for fitting it on my motherboard i made it with a milling machine, not those usual hand made with a dremel machine mods.

not really

Get with the times - TBs are the new GBs.

btw SSD is a must. I have got one in my laptop and it is just the best thing ever. Your quad core can be as fast as you want if the hd is slowing you down.

Solid state drives are extremely expensive, and sacrifice storage capacity for sheer speed.

A 512GB SSD Can cost upwards of $650.

what about 128gb for your O/S and the rest just the usual slow HD. you want a fast system and the programs you use frequently are the ones you can put on your ssd. nobody is saying that you need at 512gb SSD...

^ this. vertex 3 120gb ~215 euros, expensive? yes. but look at the speed. LOOK AT IT

also, 2500 for ur rig is /lol. surely u coulda gotten the same machine for 1750 dollars or smt.

hah i feel you kinda got robbed for that sum. The RAM is average at best, no SSD, cpu cooller crap.

This is what i put up with around 2500 eur:

Mobo: Asus P6X58D Premium | CPU: i7 920 (D0) @4.0Ghz + Noctua NH-D14 | RAM: Mushkin 998750 3 * 2 GB DDR3@1864Mhz 8-8-7-20 | GPU: CF 2 x Sapphire 5870 Vapor-X | Audio: Creative X-Fi Titanium | HDD: OCZ Vertex II 180GB + 2 x Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB | PSU: Seasonic X-750 | Case: Lian-Li PC-A70FB | Display: Acer 24" GD245HQ + Samsung 23" 2233RZ

Im going for a re-upgrade to Sandy bridge, AMD 6990, Vertex 3 SSD and a 2133mhz RAM in the coming weeks.

uve got too much money tranceh :D

Why do you need such a pc?

a) because I stream and it requires a pretty beasty PC to do so (especially when running 2 streams at the same time HQ LQ)

b) because i wanna play games on 1920x1080 all GFX to the max.

c) because I fucking can.

Reason c) was really unnecessary.

Makes you look like a dick. \:D/

#care

you can stick a finger up your ass, doesn't mean you should

cool story bro

The monitor cost $350, and you also have to take mouse, keyboard, operating system, speakers, plus construction into consideration.

who pays for windows?! D:

same person who pays for construction.

SB wont give you much advantage on I7 920 @ 4ghz but you can buy gfx card meanwhile. Wait for Ivy bridge it will improve your performance significantly.

SB processors are not enthusiastic level of processors they are replacement to 1156 not 1366. They are good but not when hardcore processors that will come at the end of this year.

Have you even seen any SB reviews because it sound's like you haven't. Not only it destroys an i7 920 performance but it even matches and outperforms sometimes the Extreme series on LGA 1366:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/...html#sect0

I picked the gaming one since it was the most relevant but feel free to check the other categories as well. So for the price of an i7 2600 i get the performance of an extreme 990 which is like 3 times more expensive. Yea..

As for Ivy bridge, I will never need that since it will cost 3 times more and be overkill for my needs.

The Ivy Bridge will be the 28nm shrink of the SB architecture, correct? Also, the Ivy Bridge will have up to 8 cores and 16 threads?

yEs

2500€? :/

amd phenom2 955 @3.8-4ghz
gigabyte 870 mobo
nvidia gtx 460 or ati 5870
2x2gb ddr3 ram
120gb ocz vertex2
2tb ext wd hdd
antec 300 case
samsung 2233rz
bequiet 500-600w psu

If you paid 2500 euro for that you have been robbed :p

na, i wanted to question the need for such a setup. what i posted isn't too far behind in games and cost a small part of what he spent.

You need this hdd: http://blog.jitbit.com/2011/04/chinese-magic-drive.html

The SB is not significantly faster than the Nehalem, only 15-20% in most cases. It's the Ivy Bridge will blow both the Nehalem and SB away. I wonder how AMD's bulldozers will perform against Intel's high-end chips.

I like how it says "hdd inside", such a freudian slip :D