best in the world is probably about 65.
OFC its not as simple as time = success, but to say time isn't a key factor is just corrupt:/
If bots were not an indication of skill then why are some players getting higher scores than others?
Then you must have had some day.
movement, reaction speed, aim
where the fuck do you some of you people from?
(...) that movement, aim, reaction speed are traits you see in a game vs bots.
I didn't for one second turn the focus off score, becuase the better you are at those threee things the higher your score will be.
Its not the only measurement ofc course, but to say its invalid is pretty stupid. When I first started playing quake 3 I couldn't even beat nightmare bots.
No, first I explained to everyone that this typo/anger thing you do is stemmed from a genuine feeling of being helpless on your part.
Vo0 proved it was not the optimum tactic
If you'de like to present your other argument below in a seperate post, I'll respond to that too, at the moment, there is so much shit in the other posts its been lost.
Your levels of hubris and denial are utterly unconvincing
but as you've already proven with your equation thing, you do think you know things which in fact end up being disproved.
which only ends up making you look slightly bitter by putting that much energy into it
Spawn abuse (to the degree he was doing) only works against bots.
Sorry its not a reality that tempts me anymore
I brought it into school on games day, charged people 10p a go and won 300-0.