VX2268wm has slightly better color accuracy and response time.

2233RZ has better ergonomics (though both are VESA-compliant), and has a much more convenient OSD.

Response time tests have lots of conflicting results.

The xbitlabs reviewer considered them equal overall if at the same pricepoint. I personally own a 2233RZ and am very satisfied with it.

Err, by 'Response time tests have lots of conflicting results.', I meant 'Input lag tests have lots of conflicting results.'

Maybe I should get an account so I could edit instead.

i've got both and prefer the 2233rz.

i can't get the 2268wm working at 120hz on anything other than native res.

Tried forcing it in drivers menu?

I've tried everything you could imagine. :(

windows 7?

why would you want anything else than native res?

Some people prefer playing at lower resolutions, i myself got used to playing in native and it didnt really take long.

800x600 is still the law.

ding ding ding!!

I thought about buying both to dual screen but I've decided to wait on the next gen 120hz lcd's.

Currently own the vx2268 and have finally managed to get 800x600 working @ 120hz - though I didn't do anything other than update drivers.

The problems I've found thus far have been:

NVIDIA: Scaling options work but only with fullscreen, 'maintain aspect ratio' bugged - win7

ATI: Scaling option completely bugged and doesn't work at all (thus resulting in having a tiny little window in the middle of my monitor)

ATI scaling now seems to be working, though it's not consistent but usually a reboot will allow me to scale if I need to.

I got the 2233RZ and its awesome.. mainly because Vo0 said he had one and he also said it was awesome!

he heard it from spart1e who also said it to be awesome