ESReality - Where Gaming Meets Reality
Not Logged In | Login | Register
23:17 CDT - 582 users online
List · Edit · iMsg
donstroke
donstroke
Posts: 62
Popularity: Nobody (0%)
Level:  Regular
Registered:  9 Feb 2012
Email:  Undisclosed
Full Name:  
Age:  34
Location:  
iM Replies:  Y
Timezone:  America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires
Country:  Argentina
Avatar:  Default
Homepage:  
Config:  None uploaded
Drafts:  0
Judgements:  6 made, 0 received
Bets Placed:  0 (Rank: -)
E$ Money:  500 (500 available)
E$ Savings:  1000
Buddied by:  0 users
Last Login:  9 Dec 2012
Theme:  Custom theme

Description:
No description submitted.


Recent Posts

Topics Replies Type
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 17:41 GMT 25 Jun 2012
I'm trying to collab with you starting a discussion about id banning criteria an
(1)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 05:59 GMT 23 Jun 2012
So when you run out of arguments, you play the grammar card. Here we can see who
(3)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 05:52 GMT 23 Jun 2012
Another stupid, another wrong asseveration.
(1)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 23:46 GMT 21 Jun 2012
No. No. This is not an assumption: "By Demiurge - Reply to #159 they've al
(6)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 19:45 GMT 21 Jun 2012
I can apply the same logic that you use to say the opposite: 1) Maybe they d
(1)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 12:48 GMT 18 Jun 2012
Interesting how a pro player like you can be so blind about this. Keep licking
(2)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 12:34 GMT 18 Jun 2012
I'm playing right now. SyncError not going to decide when I stop playing a game.
(1)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 06:53 GMT 18 Jun 2012
That comment reflects how deep inside your ass are SyncError's and id's dicks. I
(7)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 18:46 GMT 13 Jun 2012
Feel sorry for you. You are just another Adam Pyle's balls sucker. In the commen
(5)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 18:43 GMT 13 Jun 2012
Demos are more abble to prove innocence rather than NOTHING to prove guilty.
(0)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 22:44 GMT 12 Jun 2012
Because we are not used to not complain and lick the dick who try to fucks us.
(0)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 22:40 GMT 12 Jun 2012
"I can talk third word language too" O_o Chileno come guiso, ¿De qué te la das?
(2)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 21:56 GMT 12 Jun 2012
Anyway. Maybe you dont want me to talk about SyncError or ID. Maybe you are just
(4)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 21:53 GMT 12 Jun 2012
If this is the most boring topic, then you are an idiot for pressing click on th
(5)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 18:18 GMT 12 Jun 2012
"or for no reason in Id Software’s sole discretion" This is what im talking abou
(0)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 18:04 GMT 12 Jun 2012
I repeat: Here theres no proof or explanation, just an arbitrary and ambiguou
(7)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 17:46 GMT 12 Jun 2012
You would not say the same if they ban you for nothing and don't show you, or th
(1)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 17:43 GMT 12 Jun 2012
Ok. Tomorrow im gonna buy a pro account and report you because you MAY HAVE acti
(1)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 17:32 GMT 12 Jun 2012
Obviously its not a public institution. Public institutions are not permited to
(0)
Forum
Re: [id] Banning criteria
Posted @ 17:18 GMT 12 Jun 2012
Suspecting and accusing is so easy on internet. In the real life, in law studies
(7)
Forum
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners, Report a Bug