I'll get it if the build quality is at least 'decent'. I received the Venator a couple of months back and was extremely dissapointed by it's lacking build quality and squeekiness. Wasn't worth the price, gave it away to a housemate in the end.

Currently using an IE 3.0 which I love shapewise so this could be a good successor to it. Will wait till it gets positive reviews.

Not falling for this shit again.

I have strong doubts whether a mouse with detachable parts can feel solid.

It is however unfair to assume the quality of this one will be similar to his first product with the limited control and limited resources. Who gets it right on the first product?

Everything has been designed in-house on this one so I will be giving it a fair try I guess. Also because I'm a nerd that likes to try stuff.

The problem I have is in his first mouse product he just didn't send it to many people that backed it at the very beginning, and didn't offer refunds, to myself included. After a whole year of people pestering him on ESR and elsewhere, he just refunded the money.

To me bst is not trustworthy as a person. Don't care how his product might be (to those that receive it).

what do you mean?

The venator I reviewed was nice, just not a shape for me. Looking forward to trying this.

I like my aurora, will definitely support bst

Nice with an ergo mouse for lefties

I like the idea tbh. too bad I don't play quake games anymore.

Seems promising.
Will get one.

Love the modular sensor positioning.

There will be an WMO replacement when there's a Q3 replacement.