![shaftwhores only by [EXE]dann](/files/avatars/2007/51852-shaftwhore.gif "shaftwhores only by [EXE]dann"){kind=small}
Religious people of today are the worst. They indulge the human character by trivializing all things they find in nature and in their spirit as well, by not letting science and normal social life to evolve and by negating their own existence when they concentrate all the complexity and the beauty of the Universe in the hands of a dictator who didn't create the man by his own image, but who was being created by the primitive man by the image of the tyrants that he so much adore and respects. Because when he sees a merciless tyrant, he sees himself. Proud of yourself, little man?
Let's take ancient religions, for counter-example. Ancient people praised the Sun, through other things, but if you asked them about the Sun they knew that the Sun was a cosmic object who's characteristics were studies by astronomers -however they called them at the time. They were trying to understand its movement by using mathematical reason. They did not convincingly said that the Sun was an entity having similar properties to man, in any solid respect.
The relationship between man and his Gods was subtle by its nature. It was more like if I say you that I adore Jessica Biel when I see her naked and who's poster I hang on my wall (in the bathroom maybe? whatever). You could say me that I am adulating her and then you would be right. How about the idea of thinking about her like she is a real god, now? Not so fast, isn't it? This is the kind of religion that mankind experienced in the beginning.
And here then there came the Jews, with their blind, deaf but not so mute religion.
In a politheistic religion, people may adore many idols, natural elements or who knows what, and this is so hard for the priests to put together. The hell, if you was born under the sign of the planet Mars, you could chose the God of Mars as your base God. Those were the good times when we speak about the democracy of religion.
The Judaic religion in change was so atrocious, and it was putting the fate of their neighbors in such great danger, that mankind in that part of the world had to come up with something similar, or worst. The monotheistic religion of the Jews was getting very strong because it helped the priests to rally a very high number of people under a single God. It was so much easier for them to control the population! The states with monotheistic religion became better
organized when they were getting united under one king and under one priest commander in chief. This form of superior organization was putting in danger those who did not comply to the the monotheistic commander in chief God. In order for the Arabs in the Middle East to survive, to save their local and cultural identity (something that they spit on now when we are thinking about their attitude toward our cultural identity, about our European cultural identity, when we think about how they come here by the millions to multiply and to take over our streets, then over our political life by votes and finally over our resources), so they were forced then by the Jews to make up from thin air a new religion as strong and as rallying and fanatic as that that the Jews had.
One day someone asked me how come that the New Testament is so much better written than the Old Testament. It is like are two completely different books made by completely different authors, he said to me. The answer is very simple. All you have to do is to look at times and reasons. The New Testament is much better written and it presents the idea of God in a less savage manner, proclaiming Jesus teachings over those from the Old Testament, because the New Testament was written by the Europeans, while the Old Testament was written by a horde of uneducated, primitive people.
The reason why the Europeans revised the Bible and wrote a new testament was that although they accepted monotheism as the superior method to rally the masses under less leaders, to concentrate the power, they had to free the European church from the hegemony of the Jewish church, if they wanted to be leaders and not slaves of the Jewish commander in chief priests. It was all about the tools of manipulation.
Ever stopped one of you to think about the similarity between the shape of the sword and the cross? Was there a better way to remind your soldiers in who's name are they fighting? Why should you be afraid to die when your king is sending you to war, if you are holding the cross of the God in your hands? You should fight until death for your beloved king and his priests.
Every miracle and symbol has its very specific reason for this precise and well orchestrated fabrication.
Religion is a disease, and from all religions the monotheism is the worst. Because it completely removes any spark of reason or influence of rational thinking when it says that the very cause for things is not many, nor a few, but just one. It is the most totalitarian form of religion.
Let's take ancient religions, for counter-example. Ancient people praised the Sun, through other things, but if you asked them about the Sun they knew that the Sun was a cosmic object who's characteristics were studies by astronomers -however they called them at the time. They were trying to understand its movement by using mathematical reason. They did not convincingly said that the Sun was an entity having similar properties to man, in any solid respect.
The relationship between man and his Gods was subtle by its nature. It was more like if I say you that I adore Jessica Biel when I see her naked and who's poster I hang on my wall (in the bathroom maybe? whatever). You could say me that I am adulating her and then you would be right. How about the idea of thinking about her like she is a real god, now? Not so fast, isn't it? This is the kind of religion that mankind experienced in the beginning.
And here then there came the Jews, with their blind, deaf but not so mute religion.
In a politheistic religion, people may adore many idols, natural elements or who knows what, and this is so hard for the priests to put together. The hell, if you was born under the sign of the planet Mars, you could chose the God of Mars as your base God. Those were the good times when we speak about the democracy of religion.
The Judaic religion in change was so atrocious, and it was putting the fate of their neighbors in such great danger, that mankind in that part of the world had to come up with something similar, or worst. The monotheistic religion of the Jews was getting very strong because it helped the priests to rally a very high number of people under a single God. It was so much easier for them to control the population! The states with monotheistic religion became better
organized when they were getting united under one king and under one priest commander in chief. This form of superior organization was putting in danger those who did not comply to the the monotheistic commander in chief God. In order for the Arabs in the Middle East to survive, to save their local and cultural identity (something that they spit on now when we are thinking about their attitude toward our cultural identity, about our European cultural identity, when we think about how they come here by the millions to multiply and to take over our streets, then over our political life by votes and finally over our resources), so they were forced then by the Jews to make up from thin air a new religion as strong and as rallying and fanatic as that that the Jews had.
One day someone asked me how come that the New Testament is so much better written than the Old Testament. It is like are two completely different books made by completely different authors, he said to me. The answer is very simple. All you have to do is to look at times and reasons. The New Testament is much better written and it presents the idea of God in a less savage manner, proclaiming Jesus teachings over those from the Old Testament, because the New Testament was written by the Europeans, while the Old Testament was written by a horde of uneducated, primitive people.
The reason why the Europeans revised the Bible and wrote a new testament was that although they accepted monotheism as the superior method to rally the masses under less leaders, to concentrate the power, they had to free the European church from the hegemony of the Jewish church, if they wanted to be leaders and not slaves of the Jewish commander in chief priests. It was all about the tools of manipulation.
Ever stopped one of you to think about the similarity between the shape of the sword and the cross? Was there a better way to remind your soldiers in who's name are they fighting? Why should you be afraid to die when your king is sending you to war, if you are holding the cross of the God in your hands? You should fight until death for your beloved king and his priests.
Every miracle and symbol has its very specific reason for this precise and well orchestrated fabrication.
Religion is a disease, and from all religions the monotheism is the worst. Because it completely removes any spark of reason or influence of rational thinking when it says that the very cause for things is not many, nor a few, but just one. It is the most totalitarian form of religion.
Edited by ScarletJohansonsFather at 22:23 CDT, 4 April 2013 - 1229 Hits
