:>?

the low fovs fucked my brain
also needs more cypher
quite a nice movie anyhow

rakaka?

I'm not HellSpawn the swede =)

cool

Loved it!

nice. dunno how people play with the screenflash when u get hit, that shit hurts my head

i used to hate that, but i turned it back on cause i didnt always know when i was being shot :p

good concept but very short

would you rather see bad frags innit?

how u can play on such a low fov? all quake players are fucking blind or something?

nah deaf and lack brain power it seems.

I like the first afterspray more, but this one is very good too. Good job. :))

well... it could have been better at all. I dont like the idea of the ingame cfgs. No special things (apart from the last scene).. just frags, Okay, Hell5pawn always chooses good music, and he knows how to connect it with the videomaterial... but thats all. It seems like lack of want for investing enough time for the movie, dunno. Its no real Afterspray for me :)

Sorry to be negative, but the low FOV ruined this for me. Fullscreen it was completely unwatchable, and even in a little Youtube window it was pretty uncomfortable.

Ah I just read the bit about the configs, I had wondered why the FOV seemed to change! It's a cool idea, but for me you would need to, like, add +10 to everyone's FOV just to make it more comfortable to watch.

+13-18 depending on what the fov is because it's 16:9

I have to agree that the FOVs were too low in general. However, I think it's a cool idea to use the player's config, I actually really liked it! A bit too short though.

While some 90-95 fov's are hard to watch - the idea it self is very cool and and actually very useful for people who want a certain config look (so they can just copy the one the liked).

Good job.

too short, that's all

a higher fov is a must for me; felt like it was +zoom for the whole movie :S

That sort of fov would be ideal for a slow-mo rail shot etc.

What fov's were used, the actual players cfg values?

I presume something happened in the editing process, or was it really meant to be that zoomed in?

Somebody forgot to re-scale the FOVs for widescreen in wolfcam......

Loved it though.

Somebody forgot to re-scale the FOVs for widescreen in wolfcam......

I was going to ask about that. Some of those FOVs just seemed to crazy to be true.

Ah! Knew something was up!

Ah! Knew something was up!

Ah! Knew something was up!

Ah! Knew Something was up!

Loved the individual configs, made all the frags more personalized. Didn't really give a crap about the low FOV since you got to see how it actually looked to the player when it happened. I also loved the music and how you orchestrated the frags. GJ :D

like everyone said before, only problem I see is the fov, everything other is alright!

+ music
+ some frags

- picmip

short and sweet

8

so many green crosshairs o.o

green is the new yellow

Loved the idea of the configs, however I think it could've been executed better. It was a bit confusing with a new config for every frag. Maybe it would've been better to have all frags from one player shown before moving on to the next player so you get used to each config. Also, I would've liked the FOV to stay constant throughout the movie.

Other than that, great job. Enjoyed it alot!

7/10

I like short movies, re-rendering it with 0 picmip and 110 fov would make it a 8.5 in my book, now i wont post it in my local gaming forum, looks to blocky and theres no constrast black is grey, properly configured (picmip, post processing, etc) ql looks pretty good, a little blur too. Keep them coming...

interesting concept, using the players' configs for their frags, made for an interesting watch

interesting concept, using the players' configs for their frags, however the overall feeling gets damaged. 5/10

not for me. It was a lot more immersive since I acknowledge the effect different settings have on your playstyle and decisions.

Plus I liked lyon connection an awful lot, which is another movie with low fov.

our posts are almost exactly the same @_@

Interesting pov!

great using peoples own cfgs, was asking for this a while back and im glad u did it

i liked it. diff players cfg somehow freshed things up. wd gj!

btw watching downloaded movie, after youtube version is like swimming in a pool in the morning; so freaking smooth!

p.s. and not a single person using drawgun1 :(... well ofc, not with fov90, madix/cypher/etc :>

10/10 and that would be all.

E: seeing other comments, lots of bad opinions there, ignorance is a bliss

while the intro was nice the end came kinda sudden and out of nowhere.
i dont know what to think about using player configs. while it kinda destroys the movie its still very interesting.. i think seeing it one time is ok but i dont ever want to watch a movie that way again.
7/10 (the next movie of that level that also uses such configs would get 5/10 tho)

i think using a players cfg is more fitting for a solo movie

How to set the screen damage that evil uses?

seta cg_screenDamage "0xRRGGBBAA"
seta cg_screenDamage_Self "0xRRGGBBAA"

whole cfg: http://pastebin.com/917LyqQi

just what i thought:
Evil uses different fov for each weapon.

i just dont get it. how could he move so good? changing fov's constantly must fuck your movement really, i mean REALLY bad.

i used to switch fov from weapon to weapon. now i just play with 90 fov and use special zoom (not 50-45, but around 60-65) during lg-fights. basically, you need low fov only for lg. you can hit rails properly with 90 fov.

i don't know where you were looking.... bus as far as i can see its 1 fov =)

look closer then.

seta fov1 "cg_zoomfov 100; cg_fov 100"
seta fov2 "cg_zoomfov 90 ; cg_fov 280"
seta fov3 "cg_zoomfov 95 ; cg_fov 95"
seta fov4 "cg_zoomfov 105; cg_fov 98"
seta fov5 "cg_zoomfov 95 ; cg_fov 105"
seta fov6 "cg_zoomfov 105; cg_fov 90"

seta weap1 "weapon 1 ; vstr fov1; vstr stuff1 ; set z_on vstr zoom1 ; set z_off vstr weap1"
seta weap11 "weapon 11; vstr fov6; vstr stuff11; set z_on vstr zoom11; set z_off vstr weap11"
seta weap12 "weapon 12; vstr fov6; vstr stuff12; set z_on vstr zoom12; set z_off vstr weap12"
seta weap13 "weapon 13; vstr fov6; vstr stuff13; set z_on vstr zoom13; set z_off vstr weap13"
seta weap2 "weapon 2 ; vstr fov1; vstr stuff2 ; set z_on vstr zoom2 ; set z_off vstr weap2"
seta weap3 "weapon 3 ; vstr fov4; vstr stuff3 ; set z_on vstr zoom3 ; set z_off vstr weap3"
seta weap4 "weapon 4 ; vstr fov5; vstr stuff4 ; set z_on vstr zoom4 ; set z_off vstr weap4"
seta weap5 "weapon 5 ; vstr fov6; vstr stuff5 ; set z_on vstr zoom5 ; set z_off vstr weap5"
seta weap6 "weapon 6 ; vstr fov3; vstr stuff6 ; set z_on vstr zoom6 ; set z_off vstr weap6"
seta weap7 "weapon 7 ; vstr fov2; vstr stuff7 ; set z_on vstr zoom7 ; set z_off vstr weap7"
seta weap8 "weapon 8 ; vstr fov5; vstr stuff8 ; set z_on vstr zoom8 ; set z_off vstr weap8"
seta weap9 "weapon 9 ; vstr fov6; vstr stuff9 ; set z_on vstr zoom9 ; set z_off vstr weap9"

bind 1 "weapon 1"
bind c "weapon 3"
bind f "weapon 8"
bind g "weapon 4"
bind q "weapon 2"
bind r "weapon 5"
bind v "weapon 6"
bind SHIFT "weapon 7"

he does not use those settings.
A lot of pro's have those things in their config.. cypher has them in the cfg too...

my bad!

however, what do think of switching fovs depends on weapon?

ive used a lot of different config settings.
fov change per weapon and all.. doesn't really affect my movement. as long as you dont use like 120 for RL and 90 for Rail.. but thats how i see it :)

Blame fox.

always nice to see something creative. liked the idea of using players' own cfg. you tried something new, which havent been tried before. low fov doesnt bother me. picked some great frags which i missed/didnt use. liked the music. well done. (:

madix got shit config hahahahha :D

with shit he won dm13 vs rapha

personal performance

The guy who made the movie is not using the correct HUD for my config. When my config is in an actual game it looks almost identical to cyphers in gfx and "feel" as I can sit down and play perfectly with Cypher's sensitivity and everything. I have different crosshairs on different weapons which doesn't show either.
It's not that I have set this all up on purpose me and him just realized this when we compared cfg on some lan long ago.

P.S It's orginally based on "Jibo the great's" cpma vq3 config so ur point is invalid as he is the ruler of everythink.

you just replied to one month old comment... gj champ...

butthurt much?

I am perfectly fine son, haven't been online for a long time and wanted to see what I'd get. This was disappointing, you need more experience.

you must have really big problems with self confidence, if u care enough to reply to completly stranger over the internetzzz... just because he didnt like your ingame cfg...


i would suggest a therapy, but im afraid cutting your wrists may be the only option left

:{D bettar?

Still no finesse, but it will do.

is it me or 90 fov looks a lot lower ?

streched ?

The Sl1p flag is spain not sweden ! :P

Whoops! Sorry man, fixed.

liked the music and the idea with individual configs but thats pretty much it.

in comparison to agera's movie this was a clear level benath it.

6/10 +1 because of custom cfg

telling you faggots now, someone make a toxjq movie, with ghostbusters theme song, all lg frags.

instant 10 for me

telling you faggot now, only fags would want to see a movie with a ghostbuster theme song.

hit a nerve eh battyboy?

nah, i'm just telling you how it is, fuck!

Great movie really something new. I like he use players cfg :)

not bad

Am I the only one having no problem with fovs? :)

Oh wait, I'm also the one who thinks fov 110+ is warped and causes brain damage ;)

it needs player icons like the first movie but with better icons (fox with a fox instead of dinosaur-fox...rapha wih bible...av3k with shoes/that pokemon ball etc)
deleted

awesome video H5 as always

what the hell is with the configs? they don't all play with 60 FOV, do they?

lowest fov there is about 73~ ( 90 unscaled to widescreen )

thats great...

so for madix and evil hell5pawn should have set 106-108 fov to compensate for 16:9 and give it that 90 fov at 4:3 feel.

To be honest I had no idea that one has to increase FOV to compensate for widescreen resolutions. It makes sense when I think about it now though. My bad. On the otherhand I'm wondering why wolfcamql doesn't do that by default. I mean, nobody makes 4:3 videos nowadays. It's the first time I see someone meantion having to increase FOV while making a movie, no movie making guide says anything about it. Heck, this means all my previous videos didn't have 110 FOV as they supposed to have. I don't know what to say actually, heh.
Still, thanks a lot for pointing it out, I'll surely keep that in mind next time. Looks like I've learned more than I thought I would with this project. Have a [+]

care to re-release it?

Nope sorry, that would take too much time and I have other projects on my mind already.

Most welcome, well QL compensates automatically, wolfcam doesn't though.

http://www.emsai.net/projects/widescreen/fovcalc/

that should help you with the fovs

and the Weapon GunZ value goes down by a value of 1 for every 5 degree of fov above 90.

so say you used 125~ fov to get 110 effect you would have to increase the gunz by 3 to make the gun look the same as 110 on 16:9

Afterspray did have 110fov btw because it was done without wolfcam and so did zero and seventeen, however pixelbeat was ~95.

Basically Q3 and most Q3 engines besides QLs scale the fov horizontally so if you set 110 in Q3 or wolfcam for that matter in 1:1 res you get 110x and 110y now with 4:3 you get less y and even less with 16:9, and the vertical fov seems to govern most of the depth perception, so to get the same depth perception as 4:3 in 16:9 you need to increase your fov higher so the x value becomes a fairly high value ( so in 110's case ) 125 and the y fov is 94.5~.

on the other hand QL scales fov vertically with 4:3 as the reference giving you the correct fov feel from 4:3.

No guides mention it because there are no "moviemaking" guides, rather the ones out there mainly help with setting up and recording footage, but not with actual visuals like FOV.

I was aware that QL and Q3 handle FOV differently, and that Q3's way was "worse", but It had been bugging me for over a year that I didn't know exactly what was wrong. Now I do know, so if you would like, I could add it to my thread and maybe make some random page full of misc. infos (probably on http://wolfcamql.fr/en/). I'm just really lazy and probably won't finish it.

You should have asked, I've been messing with fov shit for the last year.

How would I have known to ask though? It's not like I know what everyone does in their spare time, just like nobody knows (or cares to know) the shit I do in my spare time.

Just to clear this up, I'm referring strictly to Quake-related things; I'm not talking about my deranged sexual tendencies.

errh iirc piece of paper fov zoomy thingy offered help ::DDDDDDDD

Hah, I remember that. I never did test out my theory :P

gief.

Im pretty sure someone threw out that note.

-_-

Not my fault, man! It's this family! All of ESR knows how I feel about them, and some of the things they've done :P

Should I slap your brother?

I would love that, but I haven't seen him in weeks so it may not be necessary.

okidoki.

*visibility
/e: i like the usage of individual configs.

+Love the individual configs.

-Hate the terrible fov.

Looking forward to the next time you do this with recalculated fov for widescreen :D

I quite liked the use of different CFGS, made it seem like i was watching a demo with some chill tunes playing instead of watching a super duper tryhard faggot movie.

i was kinda bummed nobody but Sl1p used weapon models though, damn.

in this video u can see who of this mofos plays with tn on lan

In general, theres nothing special about catching a guy with your LG as he falls. Too many of those.
I also agree with everyone else about the FOV being too low.

Other than those minor issues it was pretty enjoyable.

brilliant idea with cfgs! Evils cfg ftw! :)

Remember when mccormic said:

I could make a video including only Stermy and Noctis with low picmip and dubstep to get 11 out of 10 from Quakers

Funny how that worked out

The movie is a nice experiment! I liked the Idea a lot, turned out to be not the best viewing experience for me tho.


//edit: stupid me, always thought he said high picmip, realized it just now as I posted it that he said low picmic. sorry

fovs fuck with my brain... and tbh frags are average

Was an original idea to use personal configs, but the FOV changes got annoying pretty fast. Would have been better if you used the different config but kept the fov fixed and of a more typical figure for movies.

Overall, wasn't a great video to watch for me.

It was good except for the fovs, but with the authentic configs you can't help it. Was short for my taste, would've loved it around 5 mins.

10/10
awesome concept

very interesting to see with the player configs. people need to stop the whine about FOVs, it was perfectly watchable for me

Well the FOV values were technically wrong.....